[deleted]
I don't think so https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/qt5-quickcontrols2/when packages like qt5-quickcontrols are still 5.14.1
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/qt5-quickcontrols/
I don't think so https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/qt5-quickcontrols2/when packages like qt5-quickcontrols are still 5.14.1
Indeed. On my system:This is extra weird
├─(3150,Enabled,longrun) sddm-log 5
├─(1784,Enabled,longrun) dbus-log 1
├─(1790,Enabled,longrun) dbus 3
├─(3154,Enabled,longrun) sddm 6
├─(1785,Enabled,longrun) consolekit-log 2
├─(1797,Enabled,longrun) consolekit 4
Is this normal and expected process number order? You can't tell much when one of them fails to start as there is no process number.As Eric explained to me, the order in the graph is from the top to the bottom. But consolekit should start before sddm.Is this normal and expected process number order
Ho really! ...Both Sugar Light and Sugar Dark are somewhat unmaintained by now and the Github repo may not reflect the latest changes found on pling.com
Powered by Obarun